How Do You Know You Are Revolutionary?

By LaVonna Varnado-Brown

I have read articles, books, essays, viewed documentaries and engaged in conversation with like-minded comrades after clocking out from a job that does not engage your spirit, yet fuels your fight after remembering the words and work past organizers have left. The groundwork set, contemporary nonconformist thinkers have the task of answering the question. Am I revolutionary? Can I call myself a revolutionary? How would one know? Who sets the bar? What tangible fruit must be borne unto us to be deemed as such? Revolutionary.

Fred Hampton says, “That the priority of this struggle is class. That Marx and Lenin and Che Guevara and Mao Tse-Tung, and anybody else who ever said or knew or practiced anything about revolution, always said that a revolution is a class struggle.” Fighting against classism requires trusting relationships with a foundation in integrity among the working class. Revolutions are given torque by focusing on labor and the impact stopping, or removing, said labor for any period of time can cause. Do you have worker allies?

I am aware of what capitalism truly means in this country and understand the implications of the American economic system and the impact it has globally on millions of people’s quality of life. Then I get frustrated enough to talk to someone else about it and realize they are frustrated too.  Angela Davis states, “We must understand that we must completely revolutionize the entire fabric of society… Overturn the current economic structure… Destroy the political apparatus.” The paradigm shift can be put into play when visualizations of what a different working system can look and feel like become a working plan. Plans become actions, and the organized actions of many working-class individuals conceive revolution. A very small percentage of the population should not be dictating to the majority working class what the wages are and how much paid time off they get. Do you understand capitalism?

Style of language and display of action must change. Not telling you what to do. Not condescending others who are in different stages of their journey. But Audre Lorde speaks to us saying, “The true focus of revolutionary change is never merely the oppressive situations which we seek to escape, but that piece of the oppressor which is planted deep within each of us, and which knows only the oppressors’ tactics, the oppressors’ relationships.” There is a focus to call the mind’s eye to be still. To recognize in oneself, first, the remnants of patriarchy, capitalism, and fascism that stick behind and attempt to fester.  Psychological, emotional, spiritual development is happening constantly. Introspection, constructive analysis of behaviors can allow us to form trusting relationships with ourselves. To know that personal intentions are pure and grounded. Have you had a talk with self today?

After all the work must go on. The revolution will not be stopped. Cannot stop. Are you willing to fight? Fighting not your thing? Know there is a space for every revolutionary in the revolution. Make no mistake in consuming this point. Whatever you do, whichever passion drives you the hardest, makes your heart race; be driven by it. Decide once and for all if you will allow silence to suffocate you. Or choose life. The life you can create with alliances. I have decided there is no choice. I have decided there is NO alternative option. Once you’ve decided the task now is to go. Do. Take action. Educate yourself. Align with individuals. Monday, Tuesday, Wednesdays at 1418 North Claiborne, New Orleans LA you can find organizers at the table taking action in the city of New Orleans. Come join us, your voice is valid, and we welcome all revolutionaries. Are you ready to work?

Bush Dynasty Got Rich by Arming Hitler, From Oil Companies and Banking and Lies, Bought His Way Into Office

9 Reasons Not to Be Sad That War Criminal & Racist, Bush Sr. is Dead

Bush began the 1991 war with Iraq with a blatant lie that Iraqi troops were aiming to invade Saudi Arabia and cut off the U.S. oil supply and deliberating encouraging Kuwait to steal Iraqi oil. With Bush even bombing air raid shelters, 89,000 tons of bombs killed 200,000 Iraqis. He bombed the infrastructure including sewage treatment plants which led to wide spread disease. He massacred tens of thousands of Iraqi soldiers while they were retreating. By 1991, Iraq was ordering its soldiers to pull out of Kuwait through two roads. Those roads became known as the “Highway of Death” when the U.S. military bombed them “like shooting fish in a barrel,” according to one U.S. pilot.

He armed the death squads in Nicaragua that were killing anyone who opposed the Somoza dictatorship and U.S. invasion. He later pardoned all involved.

Bush was a war criminal. He violated the Geneva Convention, anti-torture convention, and War Crimes Act.

He initiated the so-called War on Drugs while allowing drugs to deliberately poison Black and other working class communities. Then threw a million people in jail where inmate slave labor is used to profit corporations.

During his presidential race against Michael Dukakis, he ran the infamous racist “Willie Horton ads”, painting young Black men as rapists and murderers. Bush Sr.’s campaign advisor would even apologize for the ad on his deathbed—Bush never did.

He sexually assaulted at least 8 women, including a 16-year-old woman by groping her when he was 79.

He let the AIDS epidemic grow to kill over 100,000 people. While mostly working class LGBT+ people were on their hospital deathbeds, Bush told them “well, change your behavior.”

As CIA director, Bush Sr. prioritized arms deals with fascist death squads in oil-rich areas, like the mujahedeen in Afghanistan (which would later become the Taliban). This was after he was on the payroll of Dresser Industries—a corporation that made a fortune off of weapons production and oil extraction.

He invaded Panama in 1989, killing 3,000 people and destroying the homes of tens of thousands more, all to keep U.S. military bases in Panama after they were scheduled to be closed by the government.

So who profited from Bush Sr.’s career? Oil corporations, private prisons, and military arms dealers (Bush’s own family!) reaped billions of dollars all throughout the criminal’s presidency. Bush Sr. was only an “American hero” to the wealthy elite that he served. He was an enemy of working class and oppressed people all over the world. It is sad that some progressives like Bernie Sanders praised him in death for his “humble and devoted service” to the country. Truth is our greatest weapon in securing a better future.

Tell The Rotten Super Rich: “You are the Problem, Not the Refugees!”

President Trump inherited his wealth from his Nazi sympathizing father, then became a billionaire by charging very high rents and excluding Black renters in NYC. He continues to unleash vicious, lying, racist, anti-immigrant tirades against suffering refugees from Central America.

Trump and the ultra-rich loot the U.S. treasury and give it to war profiteering companies. They give themselves a tax cut, refuse to raise wages and accumulate massive amounts of unearned wealth. They discuss in their luxury offices how best to turn attention away from their murderous greed. Their answer is to try to dupe us workers into believing that a lack of “papers” makes us our own enemy. They think that we’re too stupid to know who the real enemy is.

REFUGEE CRISIS MADE IN WASHINGTON & ON WALL STREET

Thousands of desperate refugees, a majority of them families, are traveling hundreds of hard miles to find shelter, food and a future. Do they really want to leave their land, their relatives? Of course not. Take one example, Honduras. In 2009 the Obama/Clinton administration through the CIA, overthrew the elected government in Honduras. This elected government was carrying out reforms that benefited the workers and peasants. The U.S. installed a brutal dictatorship that has murdered many environmentalists, community leaders and imprisoned thousands. The poverty rate has soared since this coup. Trump continues to give weapons and military training to the reactionary government.

To the U.S. capitalists and the politicians in their pockets, any country that tries to free itself from U.S. backed monopolies and raise the standard of living of the people is an enemy. The U.S. condemns Venezuela. Venezuela has just created 2.3 million new homes using money from its oil wealth. But U.S. corporations would prefer to own Venezuela’s oil, and Congress does the bidding of its corporate masters.

U.S. backed corporations require a stock of low wage labor wherever they can get it and it’s the job of the U.S. government to insure that they get it by whatever means—whether trade agreements, sanctions, or bombs. In turn, low wages in other countries bring down wages here. Workers from other countries aren’t to blame for sagging wages, capitalists are.

The refugee crisis was made in Washington and Wall Street. Take the case of Mexico. Trade agreements opened Mexico to the dumping of U.S. corn into Mexico. Corn was a main economic base crop in Mexico. While workers here also got laid off due to plants running away to Mexico, millions of rural Mexican families were pushed off the land, homeless and unemployed. But U.S. agribusiness and Agribanks made billions in profit.

WORKERS HERE SUFFER AT THE HANDS OF THE RICH

The more Trump and the rest of Wall Street, be they Republican or Democrat, attack the living standards of the working class, the more desperately they need scapegoats. Trump has clearly allied his administration with white supremacists for the same reason. They desperately want to turn attention off themselves and have us turn against one another.

The real history of the KKK and other scum like them, is that they are funded by the super wealthy in order to divide us. The bosses can always call on the KKK or other Nazi types to attack a workers’ strike or a struggle for housing. The true origin of these groups was that they were terrorists in the employ of the old slave holders who wanted to get back into power. They attacked voting rights and attacked Black and white sharecroppers uniting for a better life. Many white workers in the south today have low wages, and that is the legacy of racism dividing the workers. In short, racist, anti-immigrant groups are also always working for the superrich and against the workers.

WORKERS OF ALL COUNTRIES UNITE AGAINST OUR COMMON ENEMY – WALL ST. AND THE PENTAGON

Each of us workers must ask: where do my true interests lie? With the wealthy white rulers in Baton Rouge who just voted against increasing the minimum wage while they live in luxury? With the silver spoon parasite Trump who is attacking workers’ rights and safety regulations? Or do our interests lie with our refugee sisters and brothers?

Capitalism pits workers against one another in competition for jobs. But who sets how many jobs there are and the wages that they pay? The capitalists. Corporations have spent $450 billion buying up their company stocks so their books look good. Are they putting that money into new businesses, new jobs or raising wages? No. Where did they get that $450 billion anyway? From the unpaid labor that they force out of us workers.

What is really disgusting is that they claim that if immigrants were “legal”, we citizen workers would suffer. It is disgusting because just the opposite is true. If any group of workers is discriminated against— especially “legally”— it brings down the wages us all. Exempting farm workers from labor standards, engaging in slave labor in prisons, allowing employers to pay youth less then even the lousy minimum wage, working for food stamps rather than wages, brings down wages for all.

The government works for the rich, not us. Why are there no laws against shipping jobs out of the country? Why does the government allow capitalists to skip out on taxes and stash their stolen wealth in offshore havens? Why does the government support dictators who repress workers in other countries?

We should condemn the capitalists, the bankers, and the real estate developers as the real criminals. Of course it’s easier to take the coward’s route and simmer in hatred rather than fight back against the rich. But that path, we promise, will only bring misery. That path only enables the rich to take more away from you, your children and communities. The greater the unity of all workers, regardless of race or national origin, the better we can fight together to demand what we need.

Parents Rebel Against For-Profit Schools and School Board

Parents filled the School Board meeting chanting “Take back our schools!” and “Erase the board!”

By Nathalie Clarke

In response to the possible closure of five schools, Fisher Academy, McDonogh 32, Nelson Academy, Cypress Academy, and Edgar P. Harney, parents, students, and educators are organizing and fighting back. Friends and Families of Louisiana’s Incarcerated Children (FFLIC) first held an action in front of Edgar P. Harney, protesting the unjust investigation of principal Ashonta Wyatt and the closure of the school. All Ms. Wyatt had done was question Harney’s board’s spending and for this she was subsequently fired. When the school board didn’t respond to the protest, FFLIC urged parents, students, and educators to crowd the November 15th Orleans Parish School board meeting.

The board did everything in their power to silence their constituents. They encouraged parents from Cypress Academy not to come, and only released the meeting’s agenda 24 hours before the meeting. They also failed to inform people that in order to make comments they’d not only have to drive to the West Bank in the middle of the work day, but also arrive 30 minutes early to drop off their comment card. Nonetheless, folks took to the podium to voice their anger about the closures and about the way schools in New Orleans have been run since Katrina.

“We are surrounded by failing schools in Louisiana, but New Orleans was the only [district] for sale,” K. T. parent and native New Orleanian commented, referring to the disproportionate privatization of New Orleans schools following Katrina.

“We don’t work for you. You represent us! When did we get asked about these changes?” asked Ashana Bigard, a long-time advocate for children and families and organizer with Friends and Families of Louisiana’s Incarcerated children.

The crowd chanted “Erase the board!” while many concerned parents took to the podium to share their outrage. “Our children deserve better than Cs!” one parent protested.

The vulture capitalists who came in before Katrina’s waters even receded would have us believe that charter schools, so called “free-market” education reforms, give parents more choice and produce better schools because of competition, but any working-class parent in Orleans Parish can tell you this simply isn’t true. The Recovery School District–which took over 105 public schools in 2005 and turned them into charters–is using public money to produce failing schools. There are only 18,500 seats at schools rated “A” or “B” by the State, and 45,000 students vying to get in. Over 80% of schools in the city received a grade of C or less in 2018.

After the board meeting, parents once again rallied in front of Harney school to voice their anger about the school closure and support for Ms. Ashonta Wyatt, the principal who was fired on November 17th despite massive support from parents and the community. The fight continues: FFLIC is calling on folks to persistently show up to board meetings to protest the current state of New Orleans education. The next Orleans Parish School Board meeting will be on December 6th at 5pm.

All children deserve a free, quality education. The New Orleans Workers Group believes in community control of schools–putting schools back in the hands of teachers, parents, students, and workers. The fight to get schools back under community control is not won yet, but parents, educators, and students organizing together is how we will win. The reason the Orleans Parish School Board members feel they can stifle working-class children’s minds with failing schools is because they think we are worthless. They have forgotten our collective power as workers: we make this city run, and we will keep reminding them that they work for us.

“We are tired of being an experiment. They need to return schools to the community.” Parent Deirdre Lewis

Capitalists Reward Hyde-Smith with Millions for Her Racist Taunts

Hyde-Smith pictured at Beauvoir, the Biloxi, MS home of Confederate President Jefferson Davis. Hyde-Smith posted the photo to Facebook with the caption, “Mississippi history at its best!”

by Joseph Rosen

Cattle rancher and Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith of Mississippi wears her racism on her sleeve. But after a video of her making light of lynching went viral late in her recent campaign for a US Senate seat, some of her more prominent corporate backers like AT&T and Facebook took steps to distance themselves from her, fearing the backlash of public outrage. Fortunately for AT&T and Facebook, their capitalist comrades-in-arms at Chevron, ConocoPhillips, and Koch Industries stepped in to pick up the slack. These giant oil monopolies are apparently less concerned with public relations scandals. With the help of some well-heeled financiers and other capitalist crooks, they increased their support for the “embattled” Hyde-Smith by funneling more than $3.2 million through the National Republican Senatorial Committee, a “political party committee,” and the Senate Leadership Fund, a Super PAC.

In the now infamous video, a smiling Hyde-Smith, speaking about one of her fellow ranchers at an all white rally of her supporters, said that “if he’d invited me to a public hanging, I’d be in the front row.” There are more recorded lynchings in Mississippi than in any other state in Amerikkka: in Mississippi alone, at least 654 men, women, and children died during the reign of white supremacist terror lasting between 1877 and 1950. As recently as Feb 18, 2018, 21 year old Willie Jones Jr. was found hanging from a tree outside his child’s mother’s home in Scott County, MS. His family is still demanding a thorough investigation. Meanwhile, on December 17 the racist Hyde-Smith was sworn in to Congress.

As she has always done, Hyde-Smith will reward those who help to keep her in power. She will continue to pursue tax cuts for the rich and she will continue to lavish tax-payer money on the oil-hungry Pentagon as well as her friends in Agribusiness. And whether by denying us healthcare or by poisoning our water, she will continue her war on working and oppressed people— only she’ll be even more free to whip up racist terror as an answer to our struggle for liberation. For $3.2 million, the capitalists bought this license for her and they expect a return on their investment.

We must fight to remove this bigot from power but we have to go further to prevent that she ever returns. We can only be rid of the Hyde-Smiths of the world once we are rid of the capitalists to whom they answer; we must replace their rule with ours.

Student Debt: Who’s Profiting?

Student debt in the US now totals over $1.48 trillion, which is way higher than any other debt in the country. But one person’s debt is another’s asset. Lenders of student debt put together “packages” that tally up all that they’ve lent out to students. Then, they make fast cash selling these packages to big banks with enough money to play around with these investments, like Wells Fargo or Bank of America. These banks then reap all the profits from the interest that former students have to pay—and that’s guaranteed free money for them, since it’s almost impossible to declare bankruptcy on student debt and banks are legally allowed to take from your wages, unemployment benefits, and Social Security checks. The market for this kind of trading is $200 billion, all pocketed by wealthy capitalists who lobby Congress on issues like these regularly.

THE 1907 NEW ORLEANS DOCKWORKERS GENERAL STRIKE

Unionized dockworkers rejected bosses’ white supremacist divide-and-conquer campaign and upheld bi-racial working-class solidarity.

by Malcolm Suber

In the early twentieth century, New Orleans’ unionized dockworkers demonstrated the absolute importance of bi-racial working-class solidarity and rejected the bosses’ use of white supremacy to quash working class aspirations to advance their living conditions. They were following in the footsteps of New Orleans workers who led the general strike of 1892.

A legacy of the 1892 General Strike was the effort to maintain a 50-50, or half-and-half, labor system on the New Orleans docks. Under this arrangement, both Black and white workers insisted that any work crew hired by ship owners be 50% Black and 50% percent white. Workers would labor side by side, performing the same work for the same pay. This was understood by the dockworkers as a tactic to prevent the bosses from lowering all wages by pitting workers against each other by offering more to one group of workers than the other. Both Black and white union leaders recognized that when the owners were allowed to hire without parity between black and white workers, as was the practice before the 1892 General Strike, animosity between black and white workers flared and the working class as a whole suffered a setback.

In October 1901, the separate Black and white unions created the Dock and Cotton Council (DCC) that coordinated the unions of Black and white screwmen, longshoremen, teamsters, loaders and general laborers on the waterfront. An accommodation to the Jim Crow white supremacist system required that the President and financial secretary of the DCC be held by white workers and the vice-presidency and corresponding secretary position be held by black workers. By 1903, the DCC oversaw eight separate unions of Black and white dockworkers with a total of approximately 10,000 members and helped ensure that all unions adhered to the 50-50 rule. In time, the DCC assisted member unions in negotiations with the owners. The DCC was also given the right to call a general port strike.

The New Orleans screwmen were responsible for tightly packing cotton bales in the holds of the ships. This critical task put them atop the labor force on the docks thus providing the screwmen with the highest wages on the docks. However, in contrast to other waterfront laborers, white screwmen in the 1890s refused the 50- 50 arrangements and voted for a quota system limiting the number of black screwmen to a small percentage of the jobs.The black and white locals had separate contracts with different terms and there was no way to support workers in labor disputes. In addition, rumors began to spread that the shipping agents were trying to find ways to remove the 75-bale per day limit instituted by the white screwmen by using black screwmen who would work for lower wages with no limit on bales stowed. These types of racial division led to bloody fights between the screwmen.

By the turn of the twentieth century, all screwmen faced new pressure from the ship owners to increase their output by introducing a new method of loading the cotton bales known as “shoot-the-chute”. This system required crews of 4-5 men to throw down between 400 to 700 bales per day into the holds of ships where other workers waited to pack them. This new system required 4 to 5 times more productivity with no raise in pay. In addition, the work day would no longer be determined by the number of bales but by the whistle of the shipping agent. The screwmen could see that this faster pace would mean less work left for the next day, thus depriving them of pay.

The issue of a fair day’s work and pay became the central issue for the screwmen. In April,1902 the employers’ Steamship Conference declared that only the owners and not any contract had the right to control who worked on the docks and for how long and for what pay.The screwmen fiercely resisted this attack on their living standards. The two screwmen unions agreed to the 50-50 rule; a uniform wage scale limiting the days’ work to 120 bales as opposed the SC demand 400-700. In the fall of 1902, the unions jointly presented their demands to the steamship conference.

The screwmen’s alliance launched a series of strikes from 1902-1903 that forced the Steamship Conference to adopt the production rate and adhere to the 50-50 demands. During these strikes, the screwmen enjoyed the backing of the other waterfront unions and the newly formed DCC.

The bosses tried to break the strike by the usual divide and conquer scheme by spreading a rumor that the black screwmen were violating the agreement and getting more work than white workers. The strike remained united and ended in early December 1902; by December 25 screwmen were packing on average 110 bales per day.
In response to the screwmen’s strike, the bosses instituted two lockouts in 1903. Again, pressing for control of hiring and more production from the screwmen. The screwmen held firm and the bosses were unable to impose new labor standards.

The screwmen were again locked out on October 1, 1903, but they received the support of black and white longshoremen. Shippers led for an injunction and Mayor Paul Capdevielle unsuccessfully tried to mediate. The strikers garnered so much support during the two-week lockout that even scabs refused to cross their lines. Ultimately, the lockout ended when the employers proposed terms that required screwmen to produce 160 bales per day. The unions accepted this proposal and the bosses admitted defeat.

In the fall of 1907, both black and white longshore workers launched an extended general strike against the shipping company bosses. As in 1902-03, screwmen were at the center of the struggle as the bosses resented the contract concessions made in the 1903. When the 1903 contract expired on September 1, 1907, the ship owners sought what they called a ‘parity’ argument, demanding that New Orleans screwmen stow as much cotton as their counterparts in Galveston, TX – a rate of 200 bales per day. On October 4, all of the ship owners locked out the screwmen. In response, the DCC called a general strike. 9000 dockworkers, black and white, struck the New Orleans port in a show of solidarity with the screwmen. Freight handlers from the Southern Paci c line also struck, ending all work on the port.

The bosses responded by bringing in black and white strikebreakers. Some of the strikebreakers quit when they learned they were being used by the bosses and by the extraordinary show of support by entire working class of New Orleans.

During the second week of the strike the owners launched a strong attempt to divide and conquer the unions along racial lines. The owners revived the White League to attempt to intimidate Black strikers. They also appealed to the other dockworkers that this was a fight against the screwmen and they should not lose wages supporting their strike.

On October 11, the screwmen proposed a return to work at the rate of 160 bales per day. The bosses rejected this proposal and demand a rate of 200 bales per day. During the impasse, the bosses worked overtime to divide the workers along racial lines by circulating rumors that the white workers had returned to work, or alternately, that the black workers were returning to work. However, labor solidarity held.

The general strike ended on October 24, 1907 with a compromise plan endorsed and urged by the city’s mayor. Under the compromise, screwmen agreed to return to work at the rate of 180 bales per day. In response to union demands, the agreement included provisions for an investigation into the port’s viability. White supremacy clearly emerged as the screwmen appointed their representatives to the investigative committee along the 50- 50 principle- but white ship owners refused to work with the black representatives. When no resolution could be reached with the racist ship owners, the mayor and state legislature appointed a committee to investigate port conditions. Its focus was cross-racial cooperation among the workers on the New Orleans docks. This cooperation of course violated all norms of Jim Crow segregation. The DCC unions rejected the pressure and held out for working class solidarity to advance working conditions.

WORKER’S LETTER


By Ryan Jones

Three years ago I was a full-time worker at Burger King and like many others, my experience was not good. I was working five days a week, making the federal minimum wage, which is 7.25 an hour. Working full-time i was making $700 a month, which is not a livable wage. Not only was I supporting myself, but also my family. I didn’t receive breaks, and was required to fill multiple positions in the workplace. Like many workplaces, Burger King kept minimum staff on, expecting workers to take on the workloads of multiple people, cutting back on costs at the expense of us workers. The managers would often be aggressive towards workers, yelling at us, snatching our phones away (taking our personal property). They would often yell at us about not “doing our jobs” while we were busting our asses!

They electronically deposited our checks, so we didn’t get our check stubs in person. You could access them online, but without smartphones or computers, it can be very difficult to check and make sure your pay & hours are done right. We in the industry know it’s very common for bosses to shave a couple hours off workers’ checks. They often do this in ways that aren’t noticeable, leaving many workers experiencing wage theft without even realizing it. This is why it’s very important that we have access to our pay stubs.

I feel we should get our pay stubs in person, so we can better hold our bosses accountable. I also feel like everybody should get paid breaks, and a free shift meal. All workers should get a living wage, which at the minimum should be $15 dollars an hour. We all should have a union, so we have the power to demand the dignity and respect we deserve in the workplace. We as workers must make our voices heard, and demand the bosses start listening to what we have to say. We need to get organized as working people. Our bosses aren’t going to give us our rights, we must demand them. We gotta shut shit down.

The Bayou Bridge Pipeline Hurts Louisiana

by James York

People everywhere face an uncertain future due to climate change. That is especially true in south Louisiana, where the combination of sea level rise and disappearing coastal wetlands will force many residents to leave within decades. It is undeniable that most of the damage to this area is due to oil and gas exploration and production, and it is undeniable that we are facing a $50 billion budget shortfall just to fund the megaprojects that are supposed to provide some protection against coastal erosion.

In this light, the economic development statistics offered by the proponents of the Bayou Bridge Pipeline are absurd. In exchange for destroying 150 acres of forested wetland and “temporarily impacting” 450 more to build 163 miles of oil pipeline through the Atchafalaya Basin, Our vehemently pro-oil state government has we are being offered only $1.8 million per year in taxes paid to the state and 12 permanent jobs. While the pipeline will continue to make money for its owners and funders year after year, we the people will see nothing for this damage to the wetlands. Pipelines reduce the wetlands’ ability to protect cities and infrastructure from flooding due to hurricanes and irreparably change the hydrology of the affected area, damaging wildlife habitat. We also face the possibility of an oil spill that would threaten the drinking water of some 300,000 people and one of the most productive wetlands in the world, the heart of our $1 billion per year seafood industry. With that in mind, one would expect a reasonable government to say”no” to an obviously bad deal, but in Louisiana we are not so lucky. Our vehemently pro-oil state government has done the opposite (even with a Democratic Party governor).They have given Energy Transfer Partners, the oil corporation behind the hated pipeline, free reign to build despite ongoing legal challenges and violence by local sheriffs that they have hired for off-duty work as private security.

The state government has introduced new legislation in the past three months that pins felony terrorism charges on water protectors who are exercising their first amendment right to peacefully protest. These brave people of the L’eau Est La Vie (Water is Life) camp are living near the pipeline construction and standing up for all of our right to say NO to these projects that could damage our communities forever. Their work can be followed at nobbp.org.

Arrest the Cops Who Murdered Keeven Robinson

The family of Keeven Robinson and the Jefferson Parish NAACP demand cops’ arrest

On May 10, 2018 Keeven Robinson was choked to death by four white cops. The Parish coroner has ruled it a homicide. But the cops are still on desk duty. Taxpayers are still paying their salaries. The police cannot act as judge, jury, and executioner. The murder occurred in the course of arresting Keeven who the cops had been following on nothing more than “suspicion” which smacks of racial profiling.

“I am not comfortable knowing the people who took my brother’s life in cold blood are just walking around like nothing is going on and (are) still getting paid,” Robinson’s younger brother, Randy Martin Jr., told reporters on November 28. “They were getting paid when they took my brother’s life, and they are still getting paid today.”